PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 15.57% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 9.20%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


XLU

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.48%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.20%

XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.23%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.04%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and XLB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.41

The correlation between XLU and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLU vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
XLB

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

87.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
XLB

-

Basic Materials

XLU

-

XLB
87.6%

Communication Services

XLU

-

XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

XLB
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

XLB

-

Energy

XLU

-

XLB

-

Financial Services

XLU

-

XLB

-

Healthcare

XLU

-

XLB

-

Industrials

XLU

-

XLB
1.5%

Real Estate

XLU

-

XLB

-

Technology

XLU

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.65

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

5.05

-2.25

XLU vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLU vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-59.83%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-12.38%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-23.17%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-24.72%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-37.27%

+1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-2.25%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-10.83%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

4.04%

+0.21%

Volatility

XLU vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.59%, while Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

7.05%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

13.58%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

17.49%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

19.06%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

20.70%

-1.43%

XLU vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than XLB's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.67%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and XLB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to XLU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 10.54% vs 9.20% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLB.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.68% for XLB.

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLB is Materials. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.13% for XLB.

XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer