XLU vs. PAVE
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds - XLU tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index while PAVE tracks the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLU returned 9.31%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
XLU vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.04% return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 38.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- —
XLU vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.55% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 7.45% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.04% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and PAVE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.32 |
XLU vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
PAVE
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
PAVE
Basic Materials
XLU
-
PAVE
Communication Services
XLU
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
PAVE
Energy
XLU
-
PAVE
Financial Services
XLU
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
XLU
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
XLU
-
PAVE
Real Estate
XLU
-
PAVE
-
Technology
XLU
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
PAVE
XLU vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 2.04 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.88 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.22 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 11.84 | -9.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.04 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.80 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.68 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
XLU vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -44.08% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -11.91% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -26.23% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -26.23% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -2.50% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -6.24% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 3.24% | +0.83% |
Volatility
XLU vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.41%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 6.46% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 15.22% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 18.84% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 21.60% | -4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 24.39% | -5.13% |
XLU vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLU vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.71% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and PAVE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.29% vs 9.31% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.29% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.
XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer