XLU vs. HDV
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for HDV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLU vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 15.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLU having a 9.20% annualized return and HDV not far ahead at 9.47%.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
XLU vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 15.30% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and HDV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XLU and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLU vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
HDV
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
HDV
Basic Materials
XLU
-
HDV
Communication Services
XLU
-
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
HDV
Energy
XLU
-
HDV
Financial Services
XLU
-
HDV
Healthcare
XLU
-
HDV
Industrials
XLU
-
HDV
Real Estate
XLU
-
HDV
-
Technology
XLU
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
HDV
XLU vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.38 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 4.18 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 11.59 | -8.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -37.04% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -5.18% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -10.49% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -15.42% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -37.04% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -0.29% | -5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -3.08% | -7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 1.87% | +2.38% |
Volatility
XLU vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.10%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 3.10% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 7.44% | +4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 9.73% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 12.83% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 15.73% | +3.54% |
XLU vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLU and HDV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLU vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than HDV's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.84% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and HDV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to HDV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.47% vs 9.20% for XLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU and HDV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.67% for XLU.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HDV is Dividend. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer