PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 9.20%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


XLU

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.48%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.20%

GWW

1D
0.15%
1M
2.47%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.19%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
24.71%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.04%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
30.92%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and GWW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.33

The correlation between XLU and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.19

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.64

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

3.20

-0.40

XLU vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLU vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-56.73%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-13.92%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-24.50%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-24.50%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-41.60%

+5.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-1.05%

-5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-11.01%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

7.61%

-3.36%

Volatility

XLU vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 4.85%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.85%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

17.85%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

24.78%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

24.68%

-7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

28.52%

-9.25%

Dividends

XLU vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than GWW's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.70%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.67%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and GWW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to GWW (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs GWW's -56.73%.

GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer