GWW vs. IR
Compare and contrast key facts about W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GWW or IR.
Key characteristics
| GWW | IR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.40% | 20.69% |
| 1Y Return | 33.68% | 63.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 30.21% | 23.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 28.95% | 24.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.63 | 3.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.74% | 21.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.74% | -49.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.51% | -2.04% |
Fundamentals
| GWW | IR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $45.66B | $37.72B |
| EPS | $36.24 | $1.90 |
| PE Ratio | 25.64 | 49.21 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.80 | 1.47 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.62B | $6.88B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $5.85B | $2.33B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.82B | $1.70B |
Correlation
The correlation between GWW and IR is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GWW vs. IR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than IR's 20.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GWW vs. IR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GWW vs. IR - Dividend Comparison
GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than IR's 0.09% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% | 1.64% | 1.41% |
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.03% | 2.33% | 5.78% | 9.58% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GWW vs. IR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.74%, which is greater than IR's maximum drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and IR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GWW vs. IR - Volatility Comparison
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GWW vs. IR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities