GWW vs. ETN

In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 42.57% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 50.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GWW has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 18.85%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.37% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GWW Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWW and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than ETN's 1.05% yield.

The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.74%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) have volatilities of 8.24% and 8.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.