PortfoliosLab logo
GWW vs. CTAS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GWW and CTAS is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GWW vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GWW:

0.41

CTAS:

0.98

Sortino Ratio

GWW:

0.83

CTAS:

1.39

Omega Ratio

GWW:

1.10

CTAS:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

GWW:

0.43

CTAS:

1.27

Martin Ratio

GWW:

1.01

CTAS:

3.23

Ulcer Index

GWW:

10.39%

CTAS:

7.71%

Daily Std Dev

GWW:

22.91%

CTAS:

25.07%

Max Drawdown

GWW:

-56.74%

CTAS:

-65.32%

Current Drawdown

GWW:

-14.89%

CTAS:

-5.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWW:

$49.82B

CTAS:

$86.71B

EPS

GWW:

$38.93

CTAS:

$4.30

PE Ratio

GWW:

26.64

CTAS:

49.94

PEG Ratio

GWW:

2.41

CTAS:

3.83

PS Ratio

GWW:

2.91

CTAS:

8.56

PB Ratio

GWW:

14.41

CTAS:

18.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWW:

$17.24B

CTAS:

$10.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWW:

$6.80B

CTAS:

$5.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

GWW:

$2.84B

CTAS:

$2.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 17.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GWW has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 17.42%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.56% annualized return.


GWW

YTD

-1.42%

1M

7.95%

6M

-13.58%

1Y

8.81%

5Y*

30.92%

10Y*

17.42%

CTAS

YTD

17.76%

1M

5.92%

6M

-4.51%

1Y

23.61%

5Y*

33.39%

10Y*

27.56%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GWW vs. CTAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GWW is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GWW is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GWW is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GWW is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GWW is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GWW is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTAS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTAS is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTAS is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GWW vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GWW Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWW and CTAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GWW vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CTAS's 0.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.59%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%1.64%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
0.70%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.79%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%2.17%

Drawdowns

GWW vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.74%, smaller than the maximum CTAS drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and CTAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GWW vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 5.54%. This indicates that GWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GWW vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20212022202320242025
4.31B
2.61B
(GWW) Total Revenue
(CTAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GWW vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
39.7%
50.6%
(GWW) Gross Margin
(CTAS) Gross Margin
GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.71B and revenue of 4.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 672.00M and revenue of 4.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 609.85M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 479.00M and revenue of 4.31B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 463.50M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.