PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than GII's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has outperformed GII with an annualized return of 9.19%, while GII has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


XLU

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
3.55%
6M
1.36%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
9.19%

GII

1D
1.47%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
8.23%
6M
8.20%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.55%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
8.23%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and GII is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.65

The correlation between XLU and GII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLU vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
GII

Utilities

100.0%
26.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

21.5%

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

27.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

2.5%

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
GII
26.5%

Basic Materials

XLU

-

GII

-

Communication Services

XLU

-

GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

GII

-

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

GII

-

Energy

XLU

-

GII
21.5%

Financial Services

XLU

-

GII
4.5%

Healthcare

XLU

-

GII

-

Industrials

XLU

-

GII
27.1%

Real Estate

XLU

-

GII
0.1%

Technology

XLU

-

GII
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUGIIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.43

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

2.03

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.73

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.52

8.63

-6.11

XLU vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUGIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.43

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.74

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.29

+0.11

Drawdowns

XLU vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, roughly equal to the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-50.98%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-5.94%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-14.31%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-20.67%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-42.84%

+6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-4.11%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-11.52%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

1.88%

+2.19%

Volatility

XLU vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 3.89%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.89%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

8.82%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

10.76%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

14.11%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

17.15%

+2.11%

XLU vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLU vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, which matches GII's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.70%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.71%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and GII have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to GII (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.19% vs 8.27% for GII. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

XLU and GII have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.71%.

XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.40% for GII.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer