PortfoliosLab logo
GII vs. IGF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GII and IGF is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GII vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GII:

1.55

IGF:

1.61

Sortino Ratio

GII:

2.09

IGF:

2.14

Omega Ratio

GII:

1.30

IGF:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

GII:

2.62

IGF:

2.60

Martin Ratio

GII:

9.93

IGF:

9.93

Ulcer Index

GII:

2.32%

IGF:

2.29%

Daily Std Dev

GII:

14.83%

IGF:

14.30%

Max Drawdown

GII:

-50.98%

IGF:

-58.33%

Current Drawdown

GII:

0.00%

IGF:

-0.19%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GII having a 13.39% return and IGF slightly lower at 12.88%. Over the past 10 years, GII has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 6.84%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.33% annualized return.


GII

YTD

13.39%

1M

4.65%

6M

7.89%

1Y

20.98%

3Y*

8.95%

5Y*

12.62%

10Y*

6.84%

IGF

YTD

12.88%

1M

4.52%

6M

7.64%

1Y

20.93%

3Y*

8.14%

5Y*

11.70%

10Y*

6.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

GII vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GII vs. IGF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GII is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GII is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GII is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GII is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GII is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GII is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IGF is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IGF is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IGF is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IGF is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GII vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and IGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GII vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, which matches IGF's 2.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.85%3.23%5.94%3.07%3.88%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%3.12%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.85%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.99%3.24%3.00%

Drawdowns

GII vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and IGF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GII vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.45%. This indicates that GII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...