GII vs. BN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Brookfield Corp (BN).

GII is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure. It was launched on Jan 25, 2007.

Performance

GII vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Brookfield Corp (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GII vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	8.96%	21.79%	14.30%	5.90%	-0.54%	11.39%	-6.81%	26.32%	-10.08%	19.07%
BN Brookfield Corp	-11.65%	20.54%	44.18%	28.60%	-34.80%	49.30%	8.99%	52.68%	-10.65%	33.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 8.95%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.

GII

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: 8.96%
• 6M: 11.19%
• 1Y: 26.64%
• 3Y*: 15.62%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 8.95%

BN

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GII vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII

GII Risk / Return Rank: 92
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 95

BN

BN Risk / Return Rank: 59
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GII	BN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	0.50	+1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	0.89	+1.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.12	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	0.81	+2.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.68	2.40	+13.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GII vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and BN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GII	BN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	0.50	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.39	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.47	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.30	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between GII and BN is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GII vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than BN's 0.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	2.91%	3.17%	3.23%	3.70%	3.07%	2.37%	2.66%	3.39%	3.31%	3.38%	3.11%	3.54%
BN Brookfield Corp	0.62%	0.52%	0.56%	0.70%	1.44%	1.12%	1.55%	1.11%	1.56%	1.29%	1.58%	1.50%

Drawdowns

GII vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and BN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GII	BN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-82.22%	+31.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-22.05%	+13.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-41.85%	+21.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.84%	-51.42%	+8.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.47%	-17.55%	+14.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.60%	-28.61%	+17.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	7.40%	-5.67%

Volatility

GII vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 4.56%, while Brookfield Corp (BN) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GII	BN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	9.96%	-5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	21.50%	-13.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	33.43%	-20.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.98%	30.94%	-16.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	30.06%	-12.91%