PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GII vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GII vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 8.70%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.


GII

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
9.51%
6M
10.02%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
8.70%

TOLZ

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
11.11%
6M
12.03%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
9.51%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.11%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and TOLZ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.85

The correlation between GII and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GII vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GII
TOLZ

Industrials

27.8%
5.1%

Utilities

25.9%
22.2%

Energy

20.3%
36.0%

Financial Services

4.8%
1.9%

Technology

2.5%
0.4%

Communication Services

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.1%
7.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

GII
27.8%
TOLZ
5.1%

Utilities

GII
25.9%
TOLZ
22.2%

Energy

GII
20.3%
TOLZ
36.0%

Financial Services

GII
4.8%
TOLZ
1.9%

Technology

GII
2.5%
TOLZ
0.4%

Communication Services

GII
0.3%
TOLZ

-

Real Estate

GII
0.1%
TOLZ
7.9%

Basic Materials

GII

-

TOLZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

GII

-

TOLZ
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

GII

-

TOLZ
4.4%

Healthcare

GII

-

TOLZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GII vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIITOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.15

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

9.12

-0.31

GII vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GII vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than TOLZ's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIITOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-39.33%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-5.18%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-11.94%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-21.85%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-39.33%

-3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-3.30%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-6.61%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.78%

+0.29%

Volatility

GII vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.17%. This indicates that GII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIITOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.17%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

8.28%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

10.40%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.09%

13.98%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

16.26%

+0.88%

GII vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GII vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than TOLZ's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.67%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.67%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


GII and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GII has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to TOLZ (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, GII leads with 8.70% vs 7.84% for TOLZ. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GII has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.67% for GII.

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.46% for TOLZ.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GII and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer