XLSR vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XLSR (SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. XLSR is actively managed, while PFM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLSR returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLSR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

XLSR vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSR achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 8.18% return.

XLSR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 17.65%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: —

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSR vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF	6.52%	17.34%	17.60%	18.95%	-15.70%	20.47%	20.23%	14.13%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XLSR and PFM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019	0.87

The correlation between XLSR and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLSR vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLSR	PFM
Technology	33.5%	24.7%
Healthcare	21.9%	14.9%
Communication Services	16.4%	1.1%
Industrials	13.8%	11.1%
Energy	8.1%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	12.0%
Financial Services	0.7%	18.5%
Consumer Cyclical	0.4%	4.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

XLSR vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSR

XLSR Risk / Return Rank: 59
XLSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XLSR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XLSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
XLSR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSR vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLSR	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.09	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.07	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	2.78	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	11.28	-0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLSR vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSR and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLSR	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.09	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.79	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.53	+0.14

Drawdowns

XLSR vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSR drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSR and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLSR	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.94%	-53.21%	+20.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.06%	-7.09%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.57%	-14.50%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.32%	-17.81%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.23%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-6.94%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	1.75%	+0.73%

Volatility

XLSR vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that XLSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLSR	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	2.04%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	7.13%	+2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	9.47%	+2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	13.54%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.04%	15.21%	+4.83%

XLSR vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLSR vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

XLSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF	0.52%	0.58%	0.66%	1.04%	1.80%	3.44%	1.25%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLSR and PFM in my portfolio?

XLSR and PFM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLSR or PFM?

XLSR has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSR dropped -32.94% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, XLSR or PFM?

On 5-year performance, PFM leads with 10.63% vs 10.06% for XLSR. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLSR or PFM?

Over the 5-year period, PFM has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLSR or PFM?

PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLSR or PFM?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.52% for XLSR.

What is the main difference between XLSR and PFM?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for XLSR and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.