PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSR vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSR vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSR achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.


XLSR

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.12%
YTD
6.52%
6M
6.27%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSR vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
6.52%17.34%17.60%18.95%-15.70%20.47%20.23%14.13%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XLSR and ILCB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019

0.96

The correlation between XLSR and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLSR vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLSR
ILCB

Technology

33.5%
35.5%

Healthcare

21.9%
8.6%

Communication Services

16.4%
11.4%

Industrials

13.8%
8.6%

Energy

8.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.8%

Financial Services

0.7%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

XLSR
33.5%
ILCB
35.5%

Healthcare

XLSR
21.9%
ILCB
8.6%

Communication Services

XLSR
16.4%
ILCB
11.4%

Industrials

XLSR
13.8%
ILCB
8.6%

Energy

XLSR
8.1%
ILCB
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

XLSR
5.1%
ILCB
4.8%

Financial Services

XLSR
0.7%
ILCB
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XLSR
0.4%
ILCB
10.1%

Basic Materials

XLSR

-

ILCB
1.8%

Real Estate

XLSR

-

ILCB
1.8%

Utilities

XLSR

-

ILCB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSR vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSR
XLSR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XLSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSR vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLSRILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.10

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

14.24

-3.80

XLSR vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSR and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLSRILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.35

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.79

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.64

+0.03

Drawdowns

XLSR vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSR drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSR and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSRILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.94%

-51.53%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-9.09%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-19.05%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-25.47%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.67%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-6.24%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.97%

+0.51%

Volatility

XLSR vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSRILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.88%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

9.10%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

12.02%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.13%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

18.16%

+1.88%

XLSR vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSR vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

XLSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
0.52%0.58%0.66%1.04%1.80%3.44%1.25%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XLSR and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLSR has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSR dropped -32.94% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 10.06% for XLSR. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.52% for XLSR.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for XLSR and 0.03% for ILCB.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSR and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer