PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 8.89% return.


XLSI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.55%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.53%

GOOP

1D
5.31%
1M
-3.26%
6M
1.53%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
62.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$440.60K$549.46K$838.71K
$285.83K$265.98K$245.15K

XLSI vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and GOOP is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLSI
XLSI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLSI vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLSIGOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

2.62

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

7.41

-5.54

XLSI vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSI and GOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-27.49%

+19.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-23.32%

+15.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-14.63%

+12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-6.70%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

8.23%

-4.41%

Volatility

XLSI vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) is 4.23%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that XLSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

12.82%

-8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

26.67%

-17.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

31.51%

-20.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.17%

26.99%

-15.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.17%

26.99%

-15.82%

XLSI vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, less than GOOP's 13.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.43%11.79%13.73%2.06%
XLSI
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.89%5.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and GOOP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOP has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to XLSI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSI dropped -7.87% vs GOOP's -27.49%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 62.66% vs 6.59% for XLSI. On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 62.66% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 13.43%, compared with 11.89% for XLSI.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer