XLSI vs. BULZ
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while BULZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation Index (300%). XLSI is actively managed, while BULZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.
Performance
XLSI vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 61.20% return.
XLSI
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BULZ
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 61.20%
- 6M
- 55.42%
- 1Y
- 175.88%
- 3Y*
- 82.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLSI vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 3.26% | -1.06% |
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs | 61.20% | 38.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and BULZ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.18 |
XLSI vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLSI
BULZ
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLSI
BULZ
-
Basic Materials
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Communication Services
XLSI
-
BULZ
Consumer Cyclical
XLSI
-
BULZ
Consumer Defensive
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Energy
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Healthcare
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Industrials
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Real Estate
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Technology
XLSI
-
BULZ
Utilities
XLSI
-
BULZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BULZ
XLSI vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLSI | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and BULZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -94.44% | +86.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -24.05% | +18.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -58.04% | +54.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.87% | — |
Volatility
XLSI vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 79.22% | -68.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 91.72% | -81.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 91.72% | -81.02% |
XLSI vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.61% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and BULZ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.
XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 10.61%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.
XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BULZ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.95% for BULZ.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and BULZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer