PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. BULZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 61.20% return.


XLSI

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BULZ

1D
-2.95%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
61.20%
6M
55.42%
1Y
175.88%
3Y*
82.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and BULZ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.18

XLSI vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLSI
BULZ

Financial Services

99.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

26.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

60.8%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLSI
99.6%
BULZ

-

Basic Materials

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Communication Services

XLSI

-

BULZ
26.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XLSI

-

BULZ
13.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Energy

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Healthcare

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Industrials

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Real Estate

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Technology

XLSI

-

BULZ
60.8%

Utilities

XLSI

-

BULZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BULZ
BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSI vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLSIBULZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

XLSI vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and BULZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIBULZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-94.44%

+86.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-24.05%

+18.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-58.04%

+54.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.87%

Volatility

XLSI vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIBULZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

79.22%

-68.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.70%

91.72%

-81.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

91.72%

-81.02%

XLSI vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and BULZ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.

XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 10.61%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BULZ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.95% for BULZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and BULZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer