XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) and SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) are both exchange-traded funds - XLPP.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L returned 8.36%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for SGLP.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLPP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLP.L.

Performance

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than SGLP.L's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has underperformed SGLP.L with an annualized return of 8.36%, while SGLP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

XLPP.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 6.19%
• 1Y: 3.14%
• 3Y*: 5.55%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

SGLP.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: 33.77%
• 3Y*: 28.15%
• 5Y*: 19.87%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	6.46%	-2.88%	15.99%	-5.68%	11.45%	19.81%	5.47%	22.94%	-4.14%	2.23%
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A	3.97%	53.60%	28.14%	7.26%	11.83%	-2.88%	19.99%	14.65%	4.31%	1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XLPP.L and SGLP.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014	0.12

The correlation between XLPP.L and SGLP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLPP.L

XLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SGLP.L

SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLPP.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	1.46	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	1.90	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.29	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	1.88	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	5.06	-4.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLPP.L and SGLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLPP.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	1.46	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	1.23	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.91	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.53	+0.19

Drawdowns

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum SGLP.L drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and SGLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLPP.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.86%	-38.83%	+19.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-17.89%	+8.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.62%	-17.89%	+6.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	-17.89%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.86%	-22.34%	+3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.49%	-15.97%	+8.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-13.37%	+8.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	6.65%	-2.77%

Volatility

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) at 5.10%. This indicates that XLPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLPP.L	SGLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	5.10%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	19.90%	-8.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.19%	23.02%	-8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	16.11%	-2.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.43%	15.72%	-1.29%

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLPP.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLPP.L nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLPP.L and SGLP.L in my portfolio?

XLPP.L and SGLP.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLPP.L or SGLP.L?

On fees, SGLP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLPP.L or SGLP.L?

SGLP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLPP.L.

What is the main difference between XLPP.L and SGLP.L?

XLPP.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SGLP.L is Precious Metals. XLPP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SGLP.L tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPP.L and 0.12% for SGLP.L.