XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MVUS.L).
XLPP.L and MVUS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLPP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. MVUS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. Both XLPP.L and MVUS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLPP.L or MVUS.L.
Correlation
The correlation between XLPP.L and MVUS.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLPP.L:
1.67
MVUS.L:
2.08
XLPP.L:
2.56
MVUS.L:
3.15
XLPP.L:
1.29
MVUS.L:
1.38
XLPP.L:
3.31
MVUS.L:
4.92
XLPP.L:
9.49
MVUS.L:
13.88
XLPP.L:
1.86%
MVUS.L:
1.43%
XLPP.L:
10.55%
MVUS.L:
9.54%
XLPP.L:
-18.86%
MVUS.L:
-24.85%
XLPP.L:
-0.64%
MVUS.L:
-0.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than MVUS.L's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has underperformed MVUS.L with an annualized return of 10.46%, while MVUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.
XLPP.L
5.96%
4.56%
8.44%
18.04%
9.36%
10.46%
MVUS.L
4.00%
0.77%
10.08%
19.59%
9.98%
12.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MVUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XLPP.L
MVUS.L
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MVUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLPP.L nor MVUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum MVUS.L drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and MVUS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLPP.L vs. MVUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MVUS.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that XLPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.