XLPP.L vs. XLF

In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 10.46%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLPP.L and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XLPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 2.67%. This indicates that XLPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.