XLPP.L vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
XLPP.L and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLPP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both XLPP.L and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLPP.L or XLG.
Correlation
The correlation between XLPP.L and XLG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XLPP.L vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLPP.L:
1.58
XLG:
1.82
XLPP.L:
2.42
XLG:
2.43
XLPP.L:
1.28
XLG:
1.33
XLPP.L:
3.14
XLG:
2.49
XLPP.L:
8.99
XLG:
9.91
XLPP.L:
1.86%
XLG:
2.85%
XLPP.L:
10.60%
XLG:
15.49%
XLPP.L:
-18.86%
XLG:
-52.39%
XLPP.L:
-1.63%
XLG:
-0.39%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 10.31%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.
XLPP.L
4.90%
2.98%
7.54%
16.49%
9.13%
10.31%
XLG
3.14%
1.46%
12.01%
29.13%
17.52%
15.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLPP.L vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLPP.L vs. XLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XLPP.L
XLG
XLPP.L vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLPP.L vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
XLPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
XLPP.L vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLPP.L vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) is 3.13%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that XLPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.