XLPP.L vs. XLP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP).
XLPP.L and XLP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLPP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XLP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both XLPP.L and XLP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLPP.L or XLP.
Correlation
The correlation between XLPP.L and XLP is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XLPP.L vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLPP.L:
1.67
XLP:
1.44
XLPP.L:
2.56
XLP:
2.09
XLPP.L:
1.29
XLP:
1.25
XLPP.L:
3.31
XLP:
1.74
XLPP.L:
9.49
XLP:
5.13
XLPP.L:
1.86%
XLP:
2.84%
XLPP.L:
10.55%
XLP:
10.15%
XLPP.L:
-18.86%
XLP:
-35.89%
XLPP.L:
-0.64%
XLP:
-1.96%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 10.46%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.
XLPP.L
5.96%
4.56%
8.44%
18.04%
9.36%
10.46%
XLP
3.74%
5.58%
1.07%
13.22%
7.59%
7.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLPP.L vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLPP.L vs. XLP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XLPP.L
XLP
XLPP.L vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLPP.L vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
XLPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund | 2.67% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.53% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
XLPP.L vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and XLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLPP.L vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) is 3.21%, while Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that XLPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.