PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SGLP.L vs. IAUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SGLP.LIAUM
YTD Return15.73%14.37%
1Y Return22.89%19.50%
3Y Return (Ann)12.67%9.46%
Sharpe Ratio1.821.47
Daily Std Dev12.53%13.69%
Max Drawdown-38.83%-20.87%
Current Drawdown-2.58%-4.38%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between SGLP.L and IAUM is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SGLP.L achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly higher than IAUM's 14.37% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
36.75%
33.10%
SGLP.L
IAUM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco Physical Gold A

iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest
Expense ratio chart for IAUM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for SGLP.L: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGLP.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SGLP.L, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SGLP.L, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SGLP.L, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SGLP.L, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SGLP.L, currently valued at 9.89, compared to the broader market0.0050.00100.00150.009.89
IAUM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IAUM, currently valued at 8.90, compared to the broader market0.0050.00100.00150.008.90

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which roughly equals the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of SGLP.L and IAUM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
1.83
1.62
SGLP.L
IAUM

Dividends

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLP.L nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLP.L and IAUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
-1.66%
-4.38%
SGLP.L
IAUM

Volatility

SGLP.L vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) is 4.25%, while iShares Gold Trust Micro ETF of Benef Interest (IAUM) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that SGLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
4.25%
4.52%
SGLP.L
IAUM