XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XLPP.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while ICSU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLPP.L returned 7.90%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for ICSU.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLPP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ICSU.L.

Performance

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLPP.L having a 6.46% return and ICSU.L slightly higher at 6.60%.

XLPP.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 6.19%
• 1Y: 3.14%
• 3Y*: 5.55%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

ICSU.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 6.25%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	6.46%	-2.88%	15.99%	-5.68%	11.45%	19.81%	5.47%	22.94%	-4.14%	-2.35%
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	6.60%	-3.20%	16.26%	-5.83%	11.78%	19.63%	5.64%	22.78%	-3.96%	-2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XLPP.L and ICSU.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017	0.99

The correlation between XLPP.L and ICSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLPP.L	ICSU.L
Consumer Cyclical	98.8%	1.0%
Technology	1.0%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	99.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLPP.L

XLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ICSU.L

ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLPP.L	ICSU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	0.22	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	0.43	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.05	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	0.34	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	0.82	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is comparable to the ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLPP.L and ICSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLPP.L	ICSU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	0.22	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.59	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.48	+0.24

Drawdowns

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, roughly equal to the maximum ICSU.L drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and ICSU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLPP.L	ICSU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.86%	-18.54%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-9.24%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.62%	-11.59%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	-13.70%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.49%	-7.40%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-4.93%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	3.87%	+0.01%

Volatility

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLPP.L	ICSU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	6.57%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	11.97%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.19%	14.37%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	13.45%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.43%	14.31%	+0.12%

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLPP.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLPP.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLPP.L and ICSU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, XLPP.L and ICSU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XLPP.L or ICSU.L?

On fees, XLPP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLPP.L or ICSU.L?

XLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.

What is the main difference between XLPP.L and ICSU.L?

XLPP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPP.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.