PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ICSU.LVHVG.L
YTD Return16.00%19.16%
1Y Return16.83%25.80%
3Y Return (Ann)8.61%8.70%
5Y Return (Ann)9.19%12.56%
Sharpe Ratio1.732.51
Sortino Ratio2.613.49
Omega Ratio1.301.47
Calmar Ratio1.524.06
Martin Ratio11.1418.05
Ulcer Index1.57%1.40%
Daily Std Dev10.09%10.02%
Max Drawdown-18.54%-25.41%
Current Drawdown-0.42%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ICSU.L and VHVG.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 19.16% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.13%
8.81%
ICSU.L
VHVG.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for ICSU.L: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for VHVG.L: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (ICSU.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICSU.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICSU.L, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICSU.L, currently valued at 3.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ICSU.L, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICSU.L, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ICSU.L, currently valued at 13.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0013.62
VHVG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VHVG.L, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VHVG.L, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VHVG.L, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VHVG.L, currently valued at 3.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VHVG.L, currently valued at 15.88, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.88

ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSU.L and VHVG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.12
2.53
ICSU.L
VHVG.L

Dividends

ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ICSU.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and VHVG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.95%
-0.72%
ICSU.L
VHVG.L

Volatility

ICSU.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (ICSU.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) have volatilities of 2.99% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.99%
3.11%
ICSU.L
VHVG.L