XLP vs. HERO
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLP returned 6.70%/yr vs -4.90%/yr for HERO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
XLP vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -20.07% return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 6.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
HERO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -20.07%
- 6M
- -19.79%
- 1Y
- -25.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XLP vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 10.07% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 3.67% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -20.07% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and HERO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and HERO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLP vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
HERO
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
HERO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
HERO
-
Basic Materials
XLP
-
HERO
-
Communication Services
XLP
-
HERO
Energy
XLP
-
HERO
-
Financial Services
XLP
-
HERO
-
Healthcare
XLP
-
HERO
-
Industrials
XLP
-
HERO
Real Estate
XLP
-
HERO
-
Technology
XLP
-
HERO
Utilities
XLP
-
HERO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
HERO
XLP vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.79 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.84 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | -1.63 | +2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -54.02% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -30.21% | +20.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -30.21% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -48.06% | +31.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -32.74% | +27.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -25.99% | +18.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 15.55% | -10.45% |
Volatility
XLP vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) at 4.39%. This indicates that XLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.39% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 15.14% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 19.36% | -6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 23.36% | -9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 24.43% | -9.66% |
XLP vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLP vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than HERO's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 2.03% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.60% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and HERO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to HERO (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, XLP leads with 6.70% vs -4.90% for HERO. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLP has performed better with a 6.70% return vs -4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.03% for HERO.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while HERO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.50% for HERO.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer