XLM-USD vs. BABA
XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD returned 60.23%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for BABA. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 60.23%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -19.32%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
XLM-USD vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and BABA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XLM-USD and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
BABA
XLM-USD vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.06 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | -0.12 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -80.09% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.19% | -39.94% | -31.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -39.94% | -34.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -72.48% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | -80.09% | -16.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.80% | -62.20% | -16.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -37.56% | -34.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.48% | 19.58% | +30.90% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.07%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.48% | 10.07% | +33.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.28% | 29.24% | +30.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.60% | 43.83% | +26.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.72% | 51.40% | +23.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.79% | 43.40% | +69.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and BABA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs BABA's -80.09%.
BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer