XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD
XLM-USD (Stellar) and TRX-USD (TRON (TRX)) are both cryptocurrencies. Over the past 5 years, XLM-USD returned -8.75%/yr vs 38.59%/yr for TRX-USD. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than TRX-USD's 14.73% return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -14.93%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- -52.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- -8.75%
- 10Y*
- 57.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 40.35%
TRX-USD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 1.21%
- 3Y*
- 61.64%
- 5Y*
- 38.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 76.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
TRX-USD TRON (TRX) | $140.05M | $146.72M | $205.93M |
XLM-USD Stellar | $21.04M | $39.15M | $73.00M |
XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLM-USD Stellar | -13.58% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 1,991.09% |
TRX-USD TRON (TRX) | 14.73% | 11.86% | 135.87% | 97.75% | -27.86% | 180.88% | 102.08% | -29.71% | -57.23% | 2,056.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and TRX-USD is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLM-USD and TRX-USD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
TRX-USD
XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and TRON (TRX) (TRX-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | TRX-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.03 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.05 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 0.08 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, roughly equal to the maximum TRX-USD drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and TRX-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | TRX-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -95.89% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.28% | -26.58% | -41.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -50.98% | -23.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -59.60% | -23.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.33% | -24.71% | -55.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.21% | -61.89% | -10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.79% | 8.37% | +21.42% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. TRX-USD - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to TRON (TRX) (TRX-USD) at 4.61%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRX-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | TRX-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 4.61% | +8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.13% | 16.13% | +43.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.52% | 22.63% | +42.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.97% | 56.92% | +17.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.04% | 109.36% | +2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and TRX-USD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to TRX-USD (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs TRX-USD's -95.89%.
TRX-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and TRX-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer