XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Stellar (XLM-USD) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD).

Performance

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellar (XLM-USD) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XLM-USD Stellar	-18.72%	-39.55%	157.40%	81.66%	-73.35%	108.68%	184.76%	-29.28%
HBAR-USD HederaHashgraph	-16.76%	-60.44%	212.23%	135.51%	-87.44%	812.76%	211.49%	-88.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -18.72% return, which is significantly lower than HBAR-USD's -16.76% return.

XLM-USD

• 1D: -3.63%
• 1M: 7.63%
• YTD: -18.72%
• 6M: -60.10%
• 1Y: -36.80%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: -16.77%
• 10Y*: 53.22%

HBAR-USD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: -16.76%
• 6M: -61.16%
• 1Y: -45.22%
• 3Y*: 9.07%
• 5Y*: -22.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLM-USD

XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 46
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 25

HBAR-USD

HBAR-USD Risk / Return Rank: 55
HBAR-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HBAR-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HBAR-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HBAR-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
HBAR-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLM-USD	HBAR-USD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	-0.54	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	-0.47	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.96	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.11	-1.04	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.69	-1.53	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is comparable to the HBAR-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLM-USD and HBAR-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLM-USD	HBAR-USD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	-0.54	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	-0.21	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	-0.00	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between XLM-USD and HBAR-USD is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, roughly equal to the maximum HBAR-USD drawdown of -92.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and HBAR-USD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLM-USD	HBAR-USD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.21%	-92.79%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.49%	-73.25%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.35%	-92.79%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.50%	-82.53%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.00%	-66.62%	-5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.31%	49.84%	-5.53%

Volatility

XLM-USD vs. HBAR-USD - Volatility Comparison

Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 15.66% compared to HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) at 11.90%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBAR-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLM-USD	HBAR-USD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.66%	11.90%	+3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.47%	56.23%	-6.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.78%	69.67%	-6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.57%	90.97%	-13.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.23%	107.00%	+5.23%