XLM-USD vs. ASML
XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency, while ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD returned 60.23%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for ASML. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 60.23%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 36.00% annualized return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
XLM-USD vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and ASML is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
ASML
XLM-USD vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 7.83 | -8.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 21.08 | -21.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -90.00% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.19% | -17.85% | -53.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -45.38% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -56.84% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | -56.84% | -39.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.80% | -1.89% | -76.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -28.12% | -44.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.48% | 6.63% | +43.85% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 17.27%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.48% | 17.27% | +26.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.28% | 34.58% | +24.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.60% | 42.75% | +27.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.72% | 42.44% | +32.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.79% | 38.72% | +74.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and ASML have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to ASML (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer