PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLM-USD vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLM-USD vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellar (XLM-USD) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 60.23%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively lower 29.36% annualized return.


XLM-USD

1D
-1.52%
1M
15.17%
YTD
-6.87%
6M
-21.39%
1Y
-28.35%
3Y*
33.09%
5Y*
-11.45%
10Y*
60.23%

AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
48.78%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLM-USD vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLM-USD
Stellar
-6.87%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%14,396.90%
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XLM-USD and AAPL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLM-USD vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLM-USD vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLM-USDAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.38

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

3.40

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

8.47

-9.04

XLM-USD vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLM-USD and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLM-USD vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLM-USDAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-81.80%

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.19%

-13.80%

-57.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.37%

-33.36%

-41.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.25%

-33.36%

-49.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

-38.52%

-57.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.80%

-7.64%

-71.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.14%

-29.59%

-42.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.48%

5.53%

+44.95%

Volatility

XLM-USD vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.73%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLM-USDAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.48%

6.73%

+36.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.28%

16.53%

+42.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.60%

22.64%

+47.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.72%

27.52%

+47.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.79%

28.92%

+83.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLM-USD and AAPL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer