XLKI vs. SMH
XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. XLKI is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XLKI vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.
XLKI
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
XLKI vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.50% | 10.02% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKI and SMH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.85 |
XLKI vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLKI
SMH
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLKI
SMH
-
Technology
XLKI
SMH
Communication Services
XLKI
SMH
-
Basic Materials
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Energy
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Industrials
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Utilities
XLKI
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKI vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XLKI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
XLKI vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKI vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -84.96% | +74.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -7.01% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -41.01% | +39.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility
XLKI vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 34.87% | -16.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 35.83% | -17.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 32.97% | -14.49% |
XLKI vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLKI and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XLKI vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.74%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.74% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKI and SMH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.74%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
XLKI is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for XLKI and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer