PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKI vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKI vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.


XLKI

1D
-1.80%
1M
-2.81%
6M
9.30%
YTD
11.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
3.84%
1M
18.77%
6M
86.19%
YTD
118.00%
1Y
119.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKI vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLKI and NRGU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.08

XLKI vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLKI
NRGU

Technology

99.0%

-

Financial Services

98.0%

-

Communication Services

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLKI
99.0%
NRGU

-

Financial Services

XLKI
98.0%
NRGU

-

Communication Services

XLKI
1.0%
NRGU

-

Basic Materials

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Consumer Defensive

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Energy

XLKI

-

NRGU
100.0%

Healthcare

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Industrials

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Real Estate

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Utilities

XLKI

-

NRGU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKI vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKI vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKINRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

XLKI vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLKI vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKINRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-57.50%

+47.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-24.81%

+18.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-26.06%

+24.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.53%

Volatility

XLKI vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKINRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

76.98%

-57.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

89.07%

-69.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

89.07%

-69.85%

XLKI vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLKI vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.85%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLKI and NRGU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.85%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

XLKI is categorized as Technology Equities, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.95% for NRGU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKI and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer