XLK vs. ZBH
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ZBH (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs -1.64%/yr for ZBH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLK vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than ZBH's -1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed ZBH with an annualized return of 25.19%, while ZBH has yielded a comparatively lower -1.64% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
ZBH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- -12.72%
- 5Y*
- -9.68%
- 10Y*
- -1.64%
XLK vs. ZBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | -1.23% | -14.03% | -12.46% | -3.81% | 4.24% | -17.02% | 3.77% | 45.37% | -13.30% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and ZBH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2001 | 0.40 |
The correlation between XLK and ZBH shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. ZBH — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
ZBH
XLK vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.00 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | -0.16 | +3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | -0.31 | +11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than ZBH's maximum drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and ZBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -65.03% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -25.54% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -43.94% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -48.62% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -52.14% | +18.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -46.73% | +39.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -20.08% | -14.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 13.04% | -8.12% |
Volatility
XLK vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) at 5.90%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 5.90% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 20.40% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 30.57% | -8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 26.65% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 28.45% | -3.81% |
Dividends
XLK vs. ZBH - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than ZBH's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 1.08% | 1.07% | 0.91% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and ZBH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to ZBH (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs ZBH's -65.03%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and ZBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer