XLK vs. IGV
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 26.01%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for IGV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
XLK vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 33.79% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -17.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed IGV with an annualized return of 26.01%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.70% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 33.79%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 32.46%
- 5Y*
- 22.53%
- 10Y*
- 26.01%
IGV
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- -17.38%
- 6M
- -19.85%
- 1Y
- -16.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
XLK vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 33.79% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.38% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and IGV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and IGV has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLK vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
IGV
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLK
IGV
Energy
XLK
IGV
-
Industrials
XLK
IGV
Basic Materials
XLK
-
IGV
-
Communication Services
XLK
-
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
IGV
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
IGV
-
Financial Services
XLK
-
IGV
Healthcare
XLK
-
IGV
-
Real Estate
XLK
-
IGV
-
Utilities
XLK
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
IGV
XLK vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.92 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | -0.46 | +4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | -0.95 | +13.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than IGV's maximum drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -63.45% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -36.61% | +20.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -36.61% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -45.85% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -45.85% | +12.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -25.86% | +22.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.90% | -14.46% | -20.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 17.87% | -12.91% |
Volatility
XLK vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 11.64%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 12.72%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 12.72% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 24.91% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 28.33% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 27.97% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 26.42% | -1.71% |
XLK vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and IGV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to XLK (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 26.01% vs 15.70% for IGV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 11.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 26.01% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.39% for IGV.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer