PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. GXPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 34.34% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 24.23% return.


XLK

1D
-1.56%
1M
16.63%
YTD
34.34%
6M
33.10%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
33.46%
5Y*
23.44%
10Y*
25.62%

GXPT

1D
-1.39%
1M
13.76%
YTD
24.23%
6M
22.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLK and GXPT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKGXPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

XLK vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKGXPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

2.11

-1.69

Drawdowns

XLK vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and GXPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKGXPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-18.74%

-63.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-2.96%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-4.92%

-30.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

Volatility

XLK vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKGXPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

21.23%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

21.23%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

21.23%

+3.26%

XLK vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than GXPT's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.40%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XLK and GXPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.11% for GXPT.

XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.15% for GXPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and GXPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer