XLII vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

XLII vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.30% return.

XLII

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 9.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLII vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	9.77%	6.30%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.30%	3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLII and OMAH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.43

XLII vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLII	OMAH
Financial Services	100.8%	37.3%
Industrials	93.8%	4.9%
Technology	5.9%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	19.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.2%
Energy	-	8.8%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLII vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 51
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLII vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLII	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.13	—

Drawdowns

XLII vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLII	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-11.83%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-1.97%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.27%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLII	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	8.04%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	13.03%	-0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	13.03%	-0.84%

XLII vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLII vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, less than OMAH's 14.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.05%	12.86%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	10.97%	5.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLII and OMAH in my portfolio?

XLII and OMAH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLII or OMAH?

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLII or OMAH?

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLII or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.05%, compared with 10.97% for XLII.

What is the main difference between XLII and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.95% for OMAH.