PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLII vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLII vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's 4.01% return.


XLII

1D
-1.37%
1M
4.07%
YTD
9.77%
6M
9.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVW

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.16%
YTD
4.01%
6M
4.08%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLII vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLII and IVVW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.66

XLII vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLII
IVVW

Financial Services

100.8%
11.0%

Industrials

93.8%
7.9%

Technology

5.9%
38.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
10.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.2%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

XLII
100.8%
IVVW
11.0%

Industrials

XLII
93.8%
IVVW
7.9%

Technology

XLII
5.9%
IVVW
38.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XLII
0.3%
IVVW
10.0%

Basic Materials

XLII

-

IVVW
1.7%

Communication Services

XLII

-

IVVW
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

XLII

-

IVVW
4.6%

Energy

XLII

-

IVVW
3.2%

Healthcare

XLII

-

IVVW
8.4%

Real Estate

XLII

-

IVVW
1.8%

Utilities

XLII

-

IVVW
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLII vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLII vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLIIIVVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

XLII vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLII vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIIIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-16.79%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.37%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-1.73%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

Volatility

XLII vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIIIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

8.05%

+4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.19%

12.69%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

12.69%

-0.50%

XLII vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLII vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, less than IVVW's 19.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.86%18.55%13.72%
XLII
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
10.97%5.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLII and IVVW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLII.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.86%, compared with 10.97% for XLII.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.25% for IVVW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLII and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer