IPAV vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IPAV (Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAV is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IPAV returned 31.70% vs 52.27% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. IPAV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

IPAV vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAV achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 65.95% return.

IPAV

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 14.68%
• 6M: 15.91%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -11.11%
• YTD: 65.95%
• 6M: 62.61%
• 1Y: 52.27%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 23.05%
• 10Y*: 14.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAV vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF	14.68%	29.77%	-6.87%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	65.95%	-2.00%	0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAV and UGA is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024	-0.14

The correlation between IPAV and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IPAV vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAV

IPAV Risk / Return Rank: 51
IPAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IPAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IPAV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IPAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
IPAV Martin Ratio Rank: 47

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 46
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 41
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAV vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAV	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.49	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.00	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	2.77	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	8.29	-0.71

IPAV vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAV and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAV vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAV drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAV and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAV	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-86.59%	+72.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.59%	-18.96%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-17.12%	+12.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-36.70%	+33.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	7.05%	-2.86%

Volatility

IPAV vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) is 6.26%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that IPAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAV	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.26%	9.26%	-3.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	30.54%	-15.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	35.27%	-17.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.92%	34.45%	-16.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	37.25%	-19.33%

IPAV vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAV vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF	1.12%	1.29%	0.31%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAV and UGA in my portfolio?

IPAV and UGA have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAV or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to IPAV (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAV dropped -14.59% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, IPAV or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 52.27% vs 31.70% for IPAV. On fees, IPAV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IPAV has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAV or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 52.27% return vs 31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAV or UGA?

IPAV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAV or UGA?

IPAV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between IPAV and UGA?

IPAV is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. IPAV tracks Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPAV and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.