XLG vs. VEU
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while VEU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLG returned 17.23%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for VEU. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VEU.
Performance
XLG vs. VEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 15.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has outperformed VEU with an annualized return of 17.23%, while VEU has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.
XLG
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
VEU
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 32.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
XLG vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 5.56% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 15.75% | 32.35% | 5.56% | 15.84% | -15.58% | 8.27% | 11.10% | 21.83% | -14.18% | 27.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and VEU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XLG and VEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLG vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLG
VEU
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLG
VEU
Communication Services
XLG
VEU
Consumer Cyclical
XLG
VEU
Financial Services
XLG
VEU
Healthcare
XLG
VEU
Consumer Defensive
XLG
VEU
Energy
XLG
VEU
Industrials
XLG
VEU
Basic Materials
XLG
VEU
Real Estate
XLG
-
VEU
Utilities
XLG
-
VEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
VEU
XLG vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLG | VEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.86 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 10.95 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLG vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and VEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | VEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -61.52% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -11.43% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -13.69% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -29.14% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | -34.98% | +4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | 0.00% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -13.11% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.98% | +0.41% |
Volatility
XLG vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 4.58%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | VEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 6.91% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 14.12% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 16.19% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 16.25% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 17.26% | +1.62% |
XLG vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLG vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VEU's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 2.58% | 3.09% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.12% | 3.08% | 2.00% | 3.10% | 3.27% | 2.66% | 2.96% | 2.95% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLG and VEU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEU has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to XLG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs VEU's -61.52%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.23% vs 10.40% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.
VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while VEU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.04% for VEU.
VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and VEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer