XLG vs. SPXL
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLG returned 16.48%/yr vs 28.72%/yr for SPXL. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
XLG vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 24.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 16.48%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 28.72% annualized return.
XLG
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
SPXL
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 19.87%
- YTD
- 24.85%
- 1Y
- 55.18%
- 3Y*
- 44.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 28.72%
XLG vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 4.04% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 24.85% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and SPXL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XLG and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLG vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLG
SPXL
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
XLG
SPXL
Communication Services
XLG
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
XLG
SPXL
Financial Services
XLG
SPXL
Healthcare
XLG
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
XLG
SPXL
Energy
XLG
SPXL
Industrials
XLG
SPXL
Utilities
XLG
SPXL
Basic Materials
XLG
SPXL
Real Estate
XLG
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
SPXL
XLG vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLG | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.07 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 8.18 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLG vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -76.86% | +24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -26.77% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -48.95% | +28.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -63.80% | +35.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | -76.86% | +46.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -4.60% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -16.06% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 6.77% | -3.04% |
Volatility
XLG vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 4.63%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 10.79% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 30.09% | -18.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 37.68% | -23.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 50.59% | -31.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 53.38% | -34.51% |
XLG vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLG vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than SPXL's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.52% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XLG and SPXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXL has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to XLG (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 28.72% vs 16.48% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 28.72% return vs 16.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.52% for SPXL.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while SPXL is Leveraged Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SPXL tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer