XLG vs. DFAI
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while DFAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. XLG is passively managed, while DFAI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLG returned 15.57%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for DFAI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DFAI.
Performance
XLG vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than DFAI's 10.55% return.
XLG
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
DFAI
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XLG vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 5.56% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 4.18% |
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 10.55% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | 13.86% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and DFAI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XLG and DFAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLG vs. DFAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLG
DFAI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLG
DFAI
Communication Services
XLG
DFAI
Consumer Cyclical
XLG
DFAI
Financial Services
XLG
DFAI
Healthcare
XLG
DFAI
Consumer Defensive
XLG
DFAI
Energy
XLG
DFAI
Industrials
XLG
DFAI
Basic Materials
XLG
DFAI
Real Estate
XLG
-
DFAI
Utilities
XLG
-
DFAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
DFAI
XLG vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLG | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.35 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 9.14 | -1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLG vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than DFAI's maximum drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and DFAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -27.44% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -10.95% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -13.25% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -27.44% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -0.35% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -5.10% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.81% | +0.58% |
Volatility
XLG vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 4.58%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 5.12% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 12.28% | -1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 14.58% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 16.01% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 15.74% | +3.14% |
XLG vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLG vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DFAI's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.23% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLG and DFAI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAI has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to XLG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs DFAI's -27.44%.
On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 15.57% vs 9.68% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.
DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while DFAI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.18% for DFAI.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and DFAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer