XLF vs. TPYP
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.33%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for TPYP. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
XLF vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed TPYP with an annualized return of 13.33%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.22% annualized return.
XLF
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
TPYP
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 22.03%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
XLF vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -2.11% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 22.03% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and TPYP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLF and TPYP has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLF vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLF
TPYP
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLF
TPYP
Technology
XLF
TPYP
-
Industrials
XLF
TPYP
-
Basic Materials
XLF
-
TPYP
Communication Services
XLF
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLF
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
XLF
-
TPYP
-
Energy
XLF
-
TPYP
Healthcare
XLF
-
TPYP
-
Real Estate
XLF
-
TPYP
-
Utilities
XLF
-
TPYP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
TPYP
XLF vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 3.53 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 9.15 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -51.91% | -30.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -6.84% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -13.17% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -17.96% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | -51.91% | +9.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -3.72% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.01% | -7.88% | -12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 2.64% | +3.12% |
Volatility
XLF vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.23%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 5.30% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 10.26% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 13.14% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 17.46% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 21.93% | +0.24% |
XLF vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLF vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than TPYP's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.20% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.49% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLF and TPYP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.33% vs 12.22% for TPYP. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.
XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLF and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer