PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XLF vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XLF vs. PBP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while PBP is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.33%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for PBP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

XLF vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's 4.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed PBP with an annualized return of 13.33%, while PBP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.

XLF

1D
1.37%
1M
4.61%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.33%

PBP

1D
0.49%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.48%
6M
5.65%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF		-2.11%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF		4.48%8.49%19.83%11.59%-11.82%19.97%-3.31%14.60%-5.57%11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and PBP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.62

The correlation between XLF and PBP shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLF vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XLF
PBP

Financial Services

98.0%
11.4%

Technology

1.8%
39.5%

Industrials

0.2%
7.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

XLF
98.0%
PBP
11.4%

Technology

XLF
1.8%
PBP
39.5%

Industrials

XLF
0.2%
PBP
7.8%

Basic Materials

XLF

-

PBP
1.8%

Communication Services

XLF

-

PBP
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XLF

-

PBP
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLF

-

PBP
4.7%

Energy

XLF

-

PBP
3.3%

Healthcare

XLF

-

PBP
8.6%

Real Estate

XLF

-

PBP
1.8%

Utilities

XLF

-

PBP
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

Often compared with XLF:
XLF vs. SPYXLF vs. VFHXLF vs. KBWBXLF vs. XLVXLF vs. KREXLF vs. KBEXLF vs. JPM
Often compared with PBP:
PBP vs. SPYPBP vs. XYLDPBP vs. JEPIPBP vs. VOOPBP vs. SCHDPBP vs. FTHIPBP vs. JEPQ

Return for Risk

XLF vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XLFPBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.42
2.40

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.67
3.44

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.52

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.26

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

16.95

-15.87

XLF vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than PBP's maximum drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and PBP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XLFPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-43.43%

-39.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-5.22%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-15.42%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-18.61%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-33.31%

-9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-0.57%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-6.68%

-13.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

1.00%

+4.76%

Volatility

XLF vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 2.14%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XLFPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.14%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

5.84%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

7.10%

+7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

11.88%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

13.67%

+8.50%

XLF vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLF vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than PBP's 11.20% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF		11.20%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF		1.49%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

XLF and PBP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to PBP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs PBP's -43.43%.

On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.33% vs 7.09% for PBP. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PBP.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.20%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.

XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while PBP is Derivative Income. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.29% for PBP.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer