PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. GEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. GEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than GEV's 44.12% return.


XLF

1D
1.37%
1M
4.61%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.33%

GEV

1D
3.74%
1M
-11.47%
YTD
44.12%
6M
40.23%
1Y
93.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. GEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
-2.11%14.90%18.13%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
44.12%99.02%186.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and GEV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. GEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GEV
GEV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. GEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLFGEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.82

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

11.27

-10.19

XLF vs. GEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the GEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and GEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. GEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than GEV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and GEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFGEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-38.29%

-44.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-24.57%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-18.17%

+13.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-6.99%

-13.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

8.31%

-2.55%

Volatility

XLF vs. GEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.23%, while GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a volatility of 13.17%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFGEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

13.17%

-8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

34.45%

-23.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

49.09%

-34.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

53.62%

-34.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

53.62%

-31.45%

Dividends

XLF vs. GEV - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than GEV's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
0.16%0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.49%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLF and GEV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEV has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs GEV's -38.29%.

GEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and GEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer