XLF vs. ANGL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.33%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for ANGL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ANGL.

Performance

XLF vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 13.33%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.28% annualized return.

XLF

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: -2.11%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 6.20%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

ANGL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 2.30%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 6.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	-2.11%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.87%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and ANGL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012	0.40

The correlation between XLF and ANGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLF vs. ANGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLF	ANGL
Financial Services	98.0%	100.0%
Technology	1.8%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLF vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 15
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 15

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 55
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLF	ANGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	1.71	-1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	2.46	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.33	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	1.85	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	7.72	-6.64

XLF vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLF vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and ANGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLF	ANGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.69%	-29.31%	-53.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-4.05%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-5.48%	-10.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.81%	-19.25%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.86%	-29.31%	-13.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	0.00%	-4.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.01%	-3.29%	-16.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.76%	0.97%	+4.79%

Volatility

XLF vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.45%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLF	ANGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	1.45%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	3.54%	+7.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	4.37%	+10.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.66%	7.63%	+11.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.17%	9.28%	+12.89%

XLF vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLF vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than ANGL's 6.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.35%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.49%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLF and ANGL in my portfolio?

XLF and ANGL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLF or ANGL?

XLF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to ANGL (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

Which ETF is better, XLF or ANGL?

On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.33% vs 6.28% for ANGL. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLF or ANGL?

Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLF or ANGL?

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ANGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLF or ANGL?

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.

What is the main difference between XLF and ANGL?

XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.35% for ANGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.