XLE vs. XOVR
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XOVR (ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the ER30TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLE returned 20.12%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for XOVR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XOVR.
Performance
XLE vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than XOVR's -0.89% return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
XOVR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | 3.68% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | -0.89% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -5.02% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and XOVR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between XLE and XOVR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
XOVR
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLE
XOVR
Basic Materials
XLE
-
XOVR
-
Communication Services
XLE
-
XOVR
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
XOVR
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
XOVR
-
Financial Services
XLE
-
XOVR
Healthcare
XLE
-
XOVR
Industrials
XLE
-
XOVR
Real Estate
XLE
-
XOVR
-
Technology
XLE
-
XOVR
Utilities
XLE
-
XOVR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
XOVR
XLE vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 0.37 | +2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 0.81 | +7.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than XOVR's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and XOVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -56.28% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -24.32% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -25.23% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -49.35% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -8.06% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -18.37% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 11.02% | -6.70% |
Volatility
XLE vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.26%, while ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | XOVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 8.27% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 16.23% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 21.11% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 26.31% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 26.93% | +2.65% |
XLE vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and XOVR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOVR has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs XOVR's -56.28%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.12% vs 5.40% for XOVR. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XOVR is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while XOVR tracks ER30TR Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and EntrepreneurShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.75% for XOVR.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and XOVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer