XLE vs. SPYV
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 10.02%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for SPYV. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
XLE vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.02%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
XLE vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.32% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.98% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and SPYV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and SPYV has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLE vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
SPYV
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
SPYV
Basic Materials
XLE
-
SPYV
Communication Services
XLE
-
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
SPYV
Financial Services
XLE
-
SPYV
Healthcare
XLE
-
SPYV
Industrials
XLE
-
SPYV
Real Estate
XLE
-
SPYV
Technology
XLE
-
SPYV
Utilities
XLE
-
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
SPYV
XLE vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLE | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.24 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 12.39 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLE | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.04 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.75 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.70 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.42 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
XLE vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -58.45% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -6.22% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -17.54% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -17.89% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -36.89% | -29.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -1.35% | -5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -8.71% | -9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.62% | +2.58% |
Volatility
XLE vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.28%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 2.28% | +4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 7.18% | +9.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 9.91% | +10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 14.41% | +11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 16.95% | +12.63% |
XLE vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.56% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and SPYV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SPYV (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.83% vs 10.02% for XLE. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for SPYV.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer