PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 28.59% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 9.82%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.


XLE

1D
-1.94%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
28.59%
6M
26.16%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
9.82%

SCHM

1D
2.98%
1M
3.25%
YTD
18.78%
6M
15.85%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.59%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
18.78%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and SCHM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and SCHM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLE vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
SCHM

Energy

100.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.9%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

11.1%

Industrials

-

21.6%

Real Estate

-

6.5%

Technology

-

22.5%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
SCHM
3.6%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

SCHM
4.9%

Communication Services

XLE

-

SCHM
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

SCHM
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

SCHM
3.6%

Financial Services

XLE

-

SCHM
10.9%

Healthcare

XLE

-

SCHM
11.1%

Industrials

XLE

-

SCHM
21.6%

Real Estate

XLE

-

SCHM
6.5%

Technology

XLE

-

SCHM
22.5%

Utilities

XLE

-

SCHM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLESCHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.38

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

13.51

-4.95

XLE vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLESCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-42.43%

-28.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-9.32%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-23.27%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-26.46%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-42.43%

-24.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

-0.39%

-8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-5.65%

-12.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.33%

+1.96%

Volatility

XLE vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 5.59%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLESCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

5.59%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

12.45%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

16.14%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.06%

19.65%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

20.50%

+9.08%

XLE vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SCHM's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.61%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and SCHM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to SCHM (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 9.82% for XLE. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SCHM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for SCHM.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer