XLE vs. SCHM
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.82%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for SCHM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.
Performance
XLE vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 28.59% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 9.82%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 28.59%
- 6M
- 26.16%
- 1Y
- 36.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
SCHM
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
XLE vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.59% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.78% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and SCHM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and SCHM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLE vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
SCHM
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
SCHM
Basic Materials
XLE
-
SCHM
Communication Services
XLE
-
SCHM
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
SCHM
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
SCHM
Financial Services
XLE
-
SCHM
Healthcare
XLE
-
SCHM
Industrials
XLE
-
SCHM
Real Estate
XLE
-
SCHM
Technology
XLE
-
SCHM
Utilities
XLE
-
SCHM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
SCHM
XLE vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.38 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 13.51 | -4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SCHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -42.43% | -28.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -9.32% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -23.27% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -26.46% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -42.43% | -24.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -0.39% | -8.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -5.65% | -12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 2.33% | +1.96% |
Volatility
XLE vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 5.59%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | 5.59% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 12.45% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.60% | 16.14% | +4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 19.65% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 20.50% | +9.08% |
XLE vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SCHM's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.61% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and SCHM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to SCHM (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SCHM's -42.43%.
On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 9.82% for XLE. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SCHM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for SCHM.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and SCHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer