PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. PWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 30.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed PWB with an annualized return of 9.49%, while PWB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


XLE

1D
-3.48%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
25.06%
6M
24.78%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
9.49%

PWB

1D
3.30%
1M
7.93%
YTD
30.14%
6M
31.70%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
33.67%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
25.06%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
30.14%24.94%31.04%30.61%-25.81%19.58%31.89%24.68%0.88%30.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and PWB is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.49

The correlation between XLE and PWB shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. PWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
PWB

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.4%

Financial Services

-

9.2%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

14.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

48.9%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
PWB

-

Basic Materials

XLE

-

PWB
1.2%

Communication Services

XLE

-

PWB
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

PWB
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

PWB
7.4%

Financial Services

XLE

-

PWB
9.2%

Healthcare

XLE

-

PWB
3.2%

Industrials

XLE

-

PWB
14.8%

Real Estate

XLE

-

PWB

-

Technology

XLE

-

PWB
48.9%

Utilities

XLE

-

PWB
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLEPWBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.00

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

16.69

-9.78

XLE vs. PWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and PWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than PWB's maximum drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and PWB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEPWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-52.58%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-12.11%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-22.10%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-31.41%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-32.36%

-34.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.21%

0.00%

-11.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-8.23%

-9.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.89%

+1.49%

Volatility

XLE vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 8.02%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEPWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

9.23%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

16.98%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

20.07%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

21.28%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.61%

20.86%

+8.75%

XLE vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLE vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.69%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and PWB have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWB has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to XLE (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs PWB's -52.58%.

On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.77% vs 9.49% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while PWB is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.56% for PWB.

PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and PWB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer