XLE vs. MS
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while MS (Morgan Stanley) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 10.02%/yr vs 27.13%/yr for MS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLE vs. MS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than MS's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 10.02%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.13% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
MS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 64.89%
- 3Y*
- 39.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 27.13%
XLE vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.32% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 20.86% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and MS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.41 |
The correlation between XLE and MS shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
MS
XLE vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLE | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.46 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 11.46 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLE | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.55 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.86 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XLE vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and MS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -88.12% | +16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -18.83% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -29.24% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -32.38% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -51.33% | -15.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -2.76% | -4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -33.70% | +15.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 5.68% | -1.48% |
Volatility
XLE vs. MS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.07%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 8.06% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 21.21% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 25.62% | -5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 28.72% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 31.51% | -1.93% |
Dividends
XLE vs. MS - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than MS's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.88% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.56% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and MS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MS has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to XLE (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs MS's -88.12%.
MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and MS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer