XLE vs. HDV
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for HDV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLE vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 15.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLE having a 9.91% annualized return and HDV not far behind at 9.47%.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
XLE vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 15.30% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and HDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XLE and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
HDV
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
HDV
Basic Materials
XLE
-
HDV
Communication Services
XLE
-
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
HDV
Financial Services
XLE
-
HDV
Healthcare
XLE
-
HDV
Industrials
XLE
-
HDV
Real Estate
XLE
-
HDV
-
Technology
XLE
-
HDV
Utilities
XLE
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
HDV
XLE vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 4.18 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 11.59 | -2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -37.04% | -34.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -5.18% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -10.49% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -15.42% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -37.04% | -29.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -0.29% | -7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -3.08% | -14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 1.87% | +2.45% |
Volatility
XLE vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.10%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 3.10% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 7.44% | +9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 9.73% | +10.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 12.83% | +13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 15.73% | +13.85% |
XLE vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLE and HDV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than HDV's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.84% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and HDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to HDV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.91% vs 9.47% for HDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE and HDV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.59% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while HDV is Dividend. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer